Multivariable Artificial Pancreas for Various Exercise Types and Intensities.
| Citation | Turksoy, Kamuran, et al. “Multivariable Artificial Pancreas for Various Exercise Types and Intensities”. 2018. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, vol. 20, no. 10, 2018, pp. 662–671. |
| Center | University of Chicago |
| Featured |
Featured
|
| Author | Kamuran Turksoy, Iman Hajizadeh, Nicole Hobbs, Jennifer Kilkus, Elizabeth Littlejohn, Sediqeh Samadi, Jianyuan Feng, Mert Sevil, Caterina Lazaro, Julia Ritthaler, Brooks Hibner, Nancy Devine, Laurie Quinn, Ali Cinar |
| Keywords | Artificial pancreas, Exercise, Type 1 diabetes. |
| Abstract |
BACKGROUND: Exercise challenges people with type 1 diabetes in controlling their glucose concentration (GC). A multivariable adaptive artificial pancreas (MAAP) may lessen the burden. METHODS: The MAAP operates without any user input and computes insulin based on continuous glucose monitor and physical activity signals. To analyze performance, 18 60-h closed-loop experiments with 96 exercise sessions with three different protocols were completed. Each day, the subjects completed one resistance and one treadmill exercise (moderate continuous training [MCT] or high-intensity interval training [HIIT]). The primary outcome is time spent in each glycemic range during the exercise + recovery period. Secondary measures include average GC and average change in GC during each exercise modality. RESULTS: The GC during exercise + recovery periods were within the euglycemic range (70-180 mg/dL) for 69.9% of the time and within a safe glycemic range for exercise (70-250 mg/dL) for 93.0% of the time. The exercise sessions are defined to begin 30 min before the start of exercise and end 2 h after start of exercise. The GC were within the severe hypoglycemia (<55 mg/dL), moderate hypoglycemia (55-70 mg/dL), moderate hyperglycemia (180-250 mg/dL), and severe hyperglycemia (>250 mg/dL) for 0.9%, 1.3%, 23.1%, and 4.8% of the time, respectively. The average GC decline during exercise differed with exercise type (P = 0.0097) with a significant difference between the MCT and resistance (P = 0.0075). To prevent large GC decreases leading to hypoglycemia, MAAP recommended carbohydrates in 59% of MCT, 50% of HIIT, and 39% of resistance sessions. CONCLUSIONS: A consistent GC decline occurred in exercise and recovery periods, which differed with exercise type. The average GC at the start of exercise was above target (185.5 ± 56.6 mg/dL for MCT, 166.9 ± 61.9 mg/dL for resistance training, and 171.7 ± 41.4 mg/dL HIIT), making a small decrease desirable. Hypoglycemic events occurred in 14.6% of exercise sessions and represented only 2.22% of the exercise and recovery period. |
| Year of Publication |
2018
|
| Journal |
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
|
| Volume |
20
|
| Issue |
10
|
| Number of Pages |
662-671
|
| Date Published |
12/2018
|
| ISSN Number |
1557-8593
|
| DOI |
10.1089/dia.2018.0072
|
| Alternate Journal |
Diabetes Technol. Ther.
|
| PMCID |
PMC6161329
|
| PMID |
30188192
|
| Download citation |